1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ROE v. FRITO-LAY, INC.
 

ROE v. FRITO-LAY, INC.

Case No. 3:14-CV-00751 HSG.

JANE ROE, Plaintiff, v. FRITO-LAY, INC., a foreign corporation doing business in California, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

May 3, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jane Roe, Plaintiff, represented by Devin Heng Fok , DHF Law P.C., Andre Sherman , Girardi & Keese & Joshua E Kim , A New Way of Life Reentry Project.

Frito-Lay, Inc., Defendant, represented by Ashley Teiko Hirano , Sheppard Mullin Richter and Hampton LLP, Hali Michelle Anderson , Sheppard Mullin Richter and Hampton LLP & Samantha D. Hardy , Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton.

ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS PAST THE CURRENTLY-SCHEDULED DISCOVERY CUT-OFF

Having considered Plaintiff and Defendant's Stipulated Request for an Order Finding Good Cause to Take PMK Deposition past the currently-scheduled Discovery Cut-Off, the Court finds that good cause exists...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases