1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GALLAGHERS v. CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.
 

GALLAGHERS v. CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.

No. 15-cv-03952-HSG.

Gallaghers, v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

May 2, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colleen Gallagher, Plaintiff, represented by Donald R Hall , Kaplan Fox and Kilsheimer, pro hac vice, Frederic S. Fox , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, Linda M. Fong , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Matthew B. George , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Laurence D. King , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP & Mario Man-Lung Choi , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP.

Martin Schneider, Plaintiff, represented by Mario Man-Lung Choi , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Matthew B. George , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP & Laurence D. King , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP.

Theresa Gamage, Plaintiff, represented by Mario Man-Lung Choi , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Matthew B. George , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP & Laurence D. King , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP.

Tiffanie Zangwill, Plaintiff, represented by Mario Man-Lung Choi , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Matthew B. George , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP & Laurence D. King , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP.

Sarah Deigert, Plaintiff, represented by Mario Man-Lung Choi , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Matthew B. George , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP & Laurence D. King , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP.

Laurie Reese, Plaintiff, represented by Mario Man-Lung Choi , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Matthew B. George , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP & Laurence D. King , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP.

Nadia Parikka, Plaintiff, represented by Mario Man-Lung Choi , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Matthew B. George , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP & Laurence D. King , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP.

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., Defendant, represented by Charles C. Cavanagh , Messner Reeves, Allison Dodd , Messner Reeves, pro hac vice & Sascha Von Mende Henry , Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

RELATED CASE ORDER

A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases