1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DUNCAN v. THE SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY
 

DUNCAN v. THE SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY

Case No. 2:16-CV-293.

THEO DUNCAN, Plaintiff, v. THE SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division.

May 2, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theo Duncan, Plaintiff, represented by Randolph Gaw, Gaw, Poe LLP & Mark W. Poe, Morrison and Foerster LLP.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Defendant, represented by Geoffrey J. Moul, Murray Murphy Moul + Basil LLP, pro hac vice, Brad A. McDowell, Smith, McDowell & Powell & Christopher Todd Holland, Krieg, Keller, Sloan, Reilley & Roman LLP.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Theo Duncan and Defendant The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, pursuant to Local Rule 144, previously stipulated to a 12-day extension of time up to and including May 2, 2016 for Defendant to move or plead in response to Plaintiff's Complaint. The parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases