1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. TRANSUE v. CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL CORPORATION
 

TRANSUE v. CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL CORPORATION

Case No. 1:14-CV-1135.

MARY TRANSUE, Plaintiff, v. CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

April 28, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary Transue, Plaintiff, represented by Daryl A. Gagliardi , Wincek & DeRosa & Christopher G. Wincek , Wincek & DeRosa.

Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation, Defendant, represented by Shane M. Dawson , Dawson & Myers.

Curtis Wright Flow Control Corporation Farris Engineering/Vehicle Control, Defendant, represented by Shane M. Dawson , Dawson & Myers.

OPINION & ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Mary Transue filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. alleging that Defendants Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation, et al., terminated her employment in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Doc. No. 1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases