1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. VESTA CORPORATION v. AMDOCS MANAGEMENT LIMITED
 

VESTA CORPORATION v. AMDOCS MANAGEMENT LIMITED

No. 3:14-cv-1142-HZ.

VESTA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. AMDOCS MANAGEMENT LIMITED and AMDOCS, INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

April 4, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vesta Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew S. Ong , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, pro hac vice, Daniel T. Keese , Perkins Coie, LLP, Erick J. Haynie , Perkins Coie, LLP, Indra Neel Chatterjee , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, pro hac vice, Joanna T. Perini-Abbott , Perkins Coie, LLP, pro hac vice, Julia E. Markley , Perkins Coie, LLP, Stephen F. English , Perkins Coie, LLP & Meredith M. Price , Perkins Coie, LLP.

Amdocs Management Limited, Defendant, represented by Andrew G. Klevorn , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Bruce G. Vanyo , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Joshua L. Ross , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, PC, Meegan I. Maczek , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Richard H. Zelichov , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Robert A. Shlachter , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, PC, Yonaton M. Rosenzweig , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Christina Lucen Costley , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP & Timothy S. DeJong , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, PC.

Amdocs, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew G. Klevorn , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Bruce G. Vanyo , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Christina Lucen Costley , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Joshua L. Ross , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, PC, Kristin J. Achterhof , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Meegan I. Maczek , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Richard H. Zelichov , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Robert A. Shlachter , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, PC, Yonaton M. Rosenzweig , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice & Timothy S. DeJong , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, PC.

Sprint/United Management Company, Interested Party, represented by A. Brooks Gresham , McGuireWoods, LLP, pro hac vice, Blake S. Olson , McGuireWoods LLP, pro hac vice & Blake E. Marks-Dias , Riddell Williams PS.

OPINION & ORDER

Plaintiff Vesta Corporation brings this motion to compel Defendants Amdocs Management Limited and Amdocs, Inc. to respond to Plaintiff's Interrogatories 3 and 4. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion as to Interrogatory 3 and grants Plaintiff's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases