1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. UNICO MECHANICAL CORP. v. HARRIS
 

UNICO MECHANICAL CORP. v. HARRIS

No. 2:15-cv-0996 JAM AC (TEMP).

UNICO MECHANICAL CORP., a California Corporation, and ALFRED CONHAGEN, INC. OF CALIFORNIA, a California Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. KAMALA HARRIS, in her official capacity of Attorney General for the State of California; CHRISTINE BAKER, in her official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations; DIANE RAVNIK, in her official capacity as the Chief of the California Division of Apprenticeship Standards; and MATT RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacity as California Secretary for Environmental Protection, Defendants. STATE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, AFL-CIO, Intervenor-Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

April 5, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Unico Mechanical Corp., Plaintiff, represented by Ellen M. Bronchetti , Sheppard Mullin Richter and Hampton & Kathryn A. Visosky , Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

Alfred Conhagen, Inc. of California, Plaintiff, represented by Ellen M. Bronchetti , Sheppard Mullin Richter and Hampton & Kathryn A. Visosky , Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

Kamala Harris, Defendant, represented by John William Killeen , Office of the Attorney General.

Christine Baker, Defendant, represented by John William Killeen , Office of the Attorney General.

Diane Ravnik, Defendant, represented by John William Killeen , Office of the Attorney General.

Matt Rodriguez, Defendant, represented by John William Killeen , Office of the Attorney General.

State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO, Intervenor Defendant, represented by Dale K. Larson , Strumwasser & Woocher LLP, Fredric D. Woocher , Strumwasser & Woocher LLP, Scott A. Kronland , Altshuler Berzon LLP & Zoe Louise Palitz , Altshuler Berzon LLP.

ORDER

On March 30, 2016, the parties filed a joint statement re discovery disagreement (ECF No. 34) and defendants filed a notice of request to seal. (ECF No. 35.) Although defendants state in the joint statement that the parties met and conferred on March 22, 2016, plaintiffs contends that the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases