1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. JEAN-LOUIS v. CLEAR SPRINGS FARMING, LLC
 

JEAN-LOUIS v. CLEAR SPRINGS FARMING, LLC

Case No. 8:13-cv-3084-T-30AEP.

SHELENE JEAN-LOUIS and JUDES PETIT-FRERE, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CLEAR SPRINGS FARMING, LLC, FLORIDA GOLD CITRUS, INC., and JACK GREEN, JR., Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division.

March 31, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shelene Jean-Louis, Plaintiff, represented by Alexis Marie Barkis , Weldon & Rothman, PL, Bradley Paul Rothman , Weldon & Rothman, PL, Michelle E. Nadeau , Kwall Showers Barack & Chilson, P.A. & Ryan D. Barack , Kwall Showers Barack & Chilson, P.A..

Judes Petit-Frere, Plaintiff, represented by Alexis Marie Barkis , Weldon & Rothman, PL, Bradley Paul Rothman , Weldon & Rothman, PL, Michelle E. Nadeau , Kwall Showers Barack & Chilson, P.A. & Ryan D. Barack , Kwall Showers Barack & Chilson, P.A..

Clear Springs Farming, LLC, Defendant, represented by Amanda G. Chafin , Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, PC, Doris M. Del Castillo , Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP, John W. Campbell , Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP, Robert Gambrell Riegel, Jr. , Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, PC & James Morgan Craig , Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP.

Florida Gold Citrus, Inc., Defendant, represented by Amanda G. Chafin , Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, PC, Doris M. Del Castillo , Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP, John W. Campbell , Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP & James Morgan Craig , Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP.

Jack Green, Jr., Defendant, represented by Amanda G. Chafin , Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, PC, Doris M. Del Castillo , Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP, John W. Campbell , Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP & James Morgan Craig , Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP.

Cary R. Singletary, Mediator, represented by Cary R. Singletary , Cary R. Singletary, PA.

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendants' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 153), Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition (Dkt. 156), and the parties' Supplemental Briefs (Dkts. 175, 179). The Court, having considered the motion, response, supplemental briefing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases