1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
 

ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

Civil Action No. 14-1430-LPS-CJB.

ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity, SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., a California corporation, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, and SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

March 31, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elm 3DS Innovations LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. , Farnan LLP, Aaron R. Fahrenkrog , pro hac vice, Anthony F. Schlehuber , pro hac vice, Brian E. Farnan , Farnan LLP, Christine S. Yun Sauer , pro hac vice, Kelsey J. Thorkelson , pro hac vice, Logan J. Drew , pro hac vice, Matthew J.M. Pelikan , pro hac vice, Michael J. Farnan , Farnan LLP, Samuel L. Walling , pro hac vice, Sharon E. Roberg-Perez , pro hac vice & William H. Manning , pro hac vice.

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Defendant, represented by Adam Wyatt Poff , Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Allan M. Soobert , pro hac vice, Andrew B. Grossman , pro hac vice, Pilar Gabrielle Kraman , Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP & Raymond W. Stockstill , pro hac vice.

Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Defendant, represented by Adam Wyatt Poff , Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP & Pilar Gabrielle Kraman , Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP.

Samsung Electronics America Inc., Defendant, represented by Adam Wyatt Poff , Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP & Pilar Gabrielle Kraman , Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP.

Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC, Defendant, represented by Adam Wyatt Poff , Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP & Pilar Gabrielle Kraman , Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge Burke issued a 10-page Report and Recommendation ("Report") (D.I. 40), dated September 29, 2015, recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss ("Motion") (D.I. 25) be denied;

WHEREAS, on October 16, 2015, Defendants objected to the Report ("Objections...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases