1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CLIENTRON CORP. v. DEVON IT, INC.
 

CLIENTRON CORP. v. DEVON IT, INC.

Civil Action No. 13-05634.

CLIENTRON CORP., Plaintiff. v. DEVON IT, INC., JOHN BENNETT, and NANCE DIROCCO, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

March 29, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CLIENTRON CORP., Plaintiff, represented by JENNIFER J. SHIH , FISH & TSANG LLP, JOHN D. VAN LOBEN SELS , FISH & TSANG LLP, LARRY M. KELLER , SIDKOFF PINCUS & GREEN PC & DIANE M. BARKER , FISH & TSANG LLP.

DEVON IT, INC., Defendant, represented by GARY M. SAMMS , OBERMAYER REBBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPELL LLP & RICHARD P. LIMBURG , OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP.

JOHN BENNETT, Defendant, represented by GARY M. SAMMS , OBERMAYER REBBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPELL LLP, MICHAEL PATRICK DONOHUE , SMITH KANE, LLC & RICHARD P. LIMBURG , OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP.

NANCE DIROCCO, Defendant, represented by GARY M. SAMMS , OBERMAYER REBBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPELL LLP.

DEVON IT, INC., Counter Claimant, represented by GARY M. SAMMS , OBERMAYER REBBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPELL LLP & RICHARD P. LIMBURG , OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP.

CLIENTRON CORP., Counter Defendant, represented by JENNIFER J. SHIH , FISH & TSANG LLP, JOHN D. VAN LOBEN SELS , FISH & TSANG LLP, LARRY M. KELLER , SIDKOFF PINCUS & GREEN PC & DIANE M. BARKER , FISH & TSANG LLP.

DEVON IT, INC., Counter Claimant, represented by GARY M. SAMMS , OBERMAYER REBBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPELL LLP & RICHARD P. LIMBURG , OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP.

JOHN BENNETT, Counter Claimant, represented by GARY M. SAMMS , OBERMAYER REBBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPELL LLP, MICHAEL PATRICK DONOHUE , SMITH KANE, LLC & RICHARD P. LIMBURG , OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP.

CLIENTRON CORP., Counter Defendant, represented by JENNIFER J. SHIH , FISH & TSANG LLP, JOHN D. VAN LOBEN SELS , FISH & TSANG LLP, LARRY M. KELLER , SIDKOFF PINCUS & GREEN PC & DIANE M. BARKER , FISH & TSANG LLP.

MEMORANDUM RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE ON EXPERT TESTIMONY

The facts of this breach of contract and fraud action have been amply documented in prior opinions of this Court. See, e.g., ECF 215 at 1 n.1. A key remaining issue for trial concerns whether the evidence justifies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases