CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC. v. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC.

Civil Nos. 6:15-cv-163-JDL, 6:15-cv-164-JDL

CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a CMS TECHNOLOGIES AND CHRIMAR HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, v. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC. et al., CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a CMS TECHNOLOGIES AND CHRIMAR HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, v. AMX, LLC.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division.

March 28, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Knowles, Mediator, represented by James W Knowles, Knowles Mediations.

David Keyzer, Technical Advisor, represented by David Michael Keyzer, Law Office of David Keyzer, PC.

Chrimar Systems, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Adrienne Elizabeth Dominguez, Thompson & Knight LLP, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP, Vishal Hemant Patel, Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.

Chrimar Holding Company, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Adrienne Elizabeth Dominguez, Thompson & Knight LLP, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP, Vishal Hemant Patel, Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.

Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Defendant, represented by Danny Lloyd Williams, Williams Morgan, PC, Christopher Needham Cravey, Williams Morgan, PC, David Kent Wooten, Williams Morgan, PC, Earl Glenn Thames, Jr., Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation, Kyung Tai Kim, Williams Morgan, PC, Leisa Talbert Peschel, Williams Morgan, PC, Matthew Richard Rodgers, Williams Morgan, PC & Michael E Jones, Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Alcatel-Lucent Holdings, Inc., Defendant, represented by Danny Lloyd Williams, Williams Morgan, PC, Christopher Needham Cravey, Williams Morgan, PC, David Kent Wooten, Williams Morgan, PC, Earl Glenn Thames, Jr., Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation, Kyung Tai Kim, Williams Morgan, PC, Leisa Talbert Peschel, Williams Morgan, PC, Matthew Richard Rodgers, Williams Morgan, PC & Michael E Jones, Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise USA Inc., Defendant, represented by Danny Lloyd Williams, Williams Morgan, PC, Christopher Needham Cravey, Williams Morgan, PC, David Kent Wooten, Williams Morgan, PC, Kyung Tai Kim, Williams Morgan, PC, Leisa Talbert Peschel, Williams Morgan, PC & Matthew Richard Rodgers, Williams Morgan, PC.

AMX, LLC, Consol Defendant, represented by Brent Allen Hawkins, McDermott Will & Emery, David H Bluestone, McDermott Will & Emery, Earl Glenn Thames, Jr., Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation & Michael E Jones, Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Danny Lloyd Williams, Williams Morgan, PC, Christopher Needham Cravey, Williams Morgan, PC, David Kent Wooten, Williams Morgan, PC, Kyung Tai Kim, Williams Morgan, PC, Leisa Talbert Peschel, Williams Morgan, PC, Matthew Richard Rodgers, Williams Morgan, PC & Michael E Jones, Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Alcatel-Lucent Holdings, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Danny Lloyd Williams, Williams Morgan, PC, Christopher Needham Cravey, Williams Morgan, PC, David Kent Wooten, Williams Morgan, PC, Kyung Tai Kim, Williams Morgan, PC, Leisa Talbert Peschel, Williams Morgan, PC, Matthew Richard Rodgers, Williams Morgan, PC & Michael E Jones, Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Chrimar Holding Company, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.

Chrimar Systems, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.

Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise USA Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Danny Lloyd Williams, Williams Morgan, PC, Christopher Needham Cravey, Williams Morgan, PC, David Kent Wooten, Williams Morgan, PC, Kyung Tai Kim, Williams Morgan, PC, Leisa Talbert Peschel, Williams Morgan, PC & Matthew Richard Rodgers, Williams Morgan, PC.

Chrimar Holding Company, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.

Chrimar Systems, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.

Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Danny Lloyd Williams, Williams Morgan, PC, Christopher Needham Cravey, Williams Morgan, PC, David Kent Wooten, Williams Morgan, PC, Kyung Tai Kim, Williams Morgan, PC, Leisa Talbert Peschel, Williams Morgan, PC, Matthew Richard Rodgers, Williams Morgan, PC & Michael E Jones, Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Alcatel-Lucent Holdings, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Danny Lloyd Williams, Williams Morgan, PC, Christopher Needham Cravey, Williams Morgan, PC, David Kent Wooten, Williams Morgan, PC, Kyung Tai Kim, Williams Morgan, PC, Leisa Talbert Peschel, Williams Morgan, PC, Matthew Richard Rodgers, Williams Morgan, PC & Michael E Jones, Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Chrimar Holding Company, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.

Chrimar Systems, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.

Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise USA Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Danny Lloyd Williams, Williams Morgan, PC, Christopher Needham Cravey, Williams Morgan, PC, David Kent Wooten, Williams Morgan, PC, Kyung Tai Kim, Williams Morgan, PC, Leisa Talbert Peschel, Williams Morgan, PC & Matthew Richard Rodgers, Williams Morgan, PC.

Chrimar Holding Company, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.

Chrimar Systems, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.

AMX, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Brent Allen Hawkins, McDermott Will & Emery, David H Bluestone, McDermott Will & Emery & Michael E Jones, Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Chrimar Holding Company, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.

Chrimar Systems, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.

AMX, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Brent Allen Hawkins, McDermott Will & Emery, David H Bluestone, McDermott Will & Emery & Michael E Jones, Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Chrimar Holding Company, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.

Chrimar Systems, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Richard W Hoffmann, Reising Ethington PC, Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP & Justin S. Cohen, Thompson & Knight LLP.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc., Alcatel-Lucent Holdings, Inc., ALE USA Inc., and AMX LLC's (collectively, "Defendants") Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness. (Doc. No. 99.) Plaintiffs Chrimar Systems, Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases