1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 173 F.Supp.3d
  5. 173 F.Supp.3d 462 (2016)
 

NEXUSCARD, INC. v. KROGER CO.

Case No. 2:15-cv-968-JRG-RSP.

173 F.Supp.3d 462 (2016)

NEXUSCARD, INC., Plaintiff, v. The KROGER CO., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division.

Signed March 24, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler Law P.C., Longview, TX, for Plaintiff.

Brian Christopher Nash, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Austin, TX, Christopher Kent Dorsey, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA, Raymond Lang Sweigart, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant The Kroger Co.'s ("Kroger") Motion to Dismiss asserting that all claims in U.S. Patent No. 5,924,080 (the "'080 patent") cover an abstract idea that is not patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Kroger asserts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases