1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BEEDE v. STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC.
 

BEEDE v. STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC.

No. 1:13-cv-120 (MAD/DJS).

CLIFFORD P. BEEDE, SHERRY E. HALLIGAN, EILEEN MOTTL, and CATHERINE G. WEEKS, Plaintiffs/Counter Defendants, v. STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC. and CHARLES W. STIEFEL, Defendants/Counter Claimants.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

March 7, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifford P. Beede, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew J. Griesemer , Freeman, Howard Law Firm & Paul M. Freeman , Freeman, Howard Law Firm.

Sherry E. Halligan, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew J. Griesemer , Freeman, Howard Law Firm & Paul M. Freeman , Freeman, Howard Law Firm.

Eileen Mottl, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew J. Griesemer , Freeman, Howard Law Firm & Paul M. Freeman , Freeman, Howard Law Firm.

Catherine G. Weeks, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew J. Griesemer , Freeman, Howard Law Firm & Paul M. Freeman , Freeman, Howard Law Firm.

Stiefel Laboratories, Inc., Defendant, represented by David A. Coulson , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Hilarie Bass , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Lindsey Edelmann , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Todd D. Wozniak , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Beth L. Kaufman , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm, Cynthia E. Neidl , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm & Paulette J. Morgan , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm.

Charles W. Stiefel, Defendant, represented by David A. Coulson , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Hilarie Bass , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Lindsey Edelmann , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Todd D. Wozniak , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Beth L. Kaufman , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm, Cynthia E. Neidl , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm & Paulette J. Morgan , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm.

Brent D. Stiefel, Defendant, represented by David A. Coulson , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Hilarie Bass , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Lindsey Edelmann , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Todd D. Wozniak , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Beth L. Kaufman , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm, Cynthia E. Neidl , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm & Paulette J. Morgan , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm.

Todd Stiefel, Defendant, represented by David A. Coulson , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Hilarie Bass , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Lindsey Edelmann , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Todd D. Wozniak , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Beth L. Kaufman , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm, Cynthia E. Neidl , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm & Paulette J. Morgan , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm.

Stephen Karasick, Defendant, represented by David A. Coulson , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Hilarie Bass , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Lindsey Edelmann , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Todd D. Wozniak , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Beth L. Kaufman , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm, Cynthia E. Neidl , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm & Paulette J. Morgan , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm.

Michael Cornelius, Defendant, represented by David A. Coulson , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Hilarie Bass , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Lindsey Edelmann , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Todd D. Wozniak , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Beth L. Kaufman , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm, Cynthia E. Neidl , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm & Paulette J. Morgan , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm.

Matt S. Pattullo, Defendant, represented by David A. Coulson , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Hilarie Bass , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Lindsey Edelmann , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Todd D. Wozniak , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm, pro hac vice, Beth L. Kaufman , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm, Cynthia E. Neidl , Greenberg, Traurig Law Firm & Paulette J. Morgan , Schoeman, Updike Law Firm.

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

On January 13, 2013, Plaintiffs commenced this federal question action alleging securities fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). See Dkt. No. 1. Pursuant to a stipulation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases