WALKER v. SCOTT

Case No. 10-5629 VAP (PJW).

JEFFREY E. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. DR. SCOTT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

February 11, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey E Walker, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Dr. Scott, Psychiatrist, Individual, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

Dr. Scott, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

Doctor Fishback, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

Sgt. Schnore, Individually, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

J. Margado, Psych Tech Lpt., Individually, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

Doctor Fishback, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

Prison Administration Health Care at California Men's Colony, Individually, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

D Baldwin, CCI Counselor, Individually, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

D Baldwin, CCI Counselor, Official Capacity, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

Sgt. Schnore, Official Capacity, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

Lt. Robinson, Indiviually, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

Lt. Robinson, Official Capacity, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

Terry Gonzales, Warden, Individually, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

Terry Gonzales, Warden, Official Capacity, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.

J. Margado, PsychTech Ltp., Official Capacity, Defendant, represented by Danielle Rachel Hemple , Office of Attorney General.


ORDER

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, and expenses of any type, including attorney's fees. There is no prevailing party in this action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases