CYRUS R. SANDERS, Plaintiff
v.
EMANUEL ROSE, et al., Defendants
United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 8, 2016.
February 8, 2016.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Cyrus R Sanders, Plaintiff, Pro Se.
Emanuel Rose, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
Lt. Hewitt, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
Counselor "Jill", Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
Warden DeRose, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
Dauphin County Prison, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
Lt. Carnazzo, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
Major Stewart, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
Connie Orosz, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
Frank J. Lavery, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
William Tully, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
Dauphin County Prison Board, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
Jeffrey Haste, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
Dauphin County Commissioners, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
C.O. Joann Cryder, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
Throne, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
Jill Cuffaro, Defendant, represented by Matthew Lee Owens , Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Esquire, LLC.
ORDER
YVETTE KANE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 8th day of February 2016, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 113), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Motion (Doc. Nos. 113) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
