1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CLARK v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
 

CLARK v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

No. 2:15-cv-1211-JAM-EFB PS (TEMP).

FELICIA CLARK, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

February 3, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Felicia Clark, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

County of Sacramento, Defendant, represented by Jill B. Nathan , Rivera & Associates.

Andrew Nelson, Defendant, represented by Jill B. Nathan , Rivera & Associates.

Christopher Kemp, Defendant, represented by Jill B. Nathan , Rivera & Associates.

ORDER

Defendants moved to dismiss this action and noticed their motion for hearing on February 10, 2016. ECF No. 11. Court records reflect that plaintiff has not filed a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion.

Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases