FRANKLIN-THOMAS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

Case No. 2:15-cv-01260-LDG-CWH.

ANGELIC FRANKLIN-THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., and DOES 1 through 100; and ROE CORPORATIONS 101 through 200, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

January 22, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Angelic Franklin-Thomas, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher D. Burk , Bernstein & Poisson & Scott Poisson , Bernstein & Poisson.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendant, represented by Alyssa Marie Aklestad , Phillips Spallas & Angstadt & Brenda H Entzminger , Phillips, Spallas & Angstadt, LLC.


STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, that the above-captioned matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear that party's own costs and attorney's fees.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases