1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. EDWARDS v. PILATUS AIRCRAFT, LTD.
 

EDWARDS v. PILATUS AIRCRAFT, LTD.

Civil Action No. 15-cv-00567-PAB-MJW.

MARK EDWARDS, as Personal Representative of the Estates of Ronald Bramlage, deceased, Rebecca Bramlage, deceased, Brandon Bramlage, deceased, Boston Bramlage, deceased, Beau Bramlage, deceased, and Roxanne Bramlage, deceased, Plaintiff, v. PILATUS AIRCRAFT, LTD., a/k/a Pilatus Flugzeugweke Aktiengesellschaft, a Swiss company doing business in the United States, PILATUS BUSINESS AIRCRAFT, LTD., a Colorado corporation, and HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., individually and as successor to AlliedSignal Aerospace, Inc., and Bendix/King, a Delaware corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

January 15, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Edwards, Plaintiff, represented by Barry Edward Newman , Spohrer & Dodd, P.L. & Robert F. Spohrer , Spohrer & Dodd, P.L..

Pilatus Aircraft, Ltd., Defendant, represented by Bruce J. Berman , Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., David Lanier Luck , Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., Jaret Joseph Fuente , Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. & Jason D. Melichar , Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP.

Pilatus Business Aircraft, Ltd., a Colorado corporation, Defendant, represented by Bruce J. Berman , Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., David Lanier Luck , Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., Jaret Joseph Fuente , Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. & Jason D. Melichar , Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP.

Honeywell International Inc., Defendant, represented by Christopher J. Raistrick , Adler Murphy & McQuillen, LLP, John Carl Knudsen , ALG Attorneys, PLLC, Michael G. McQuillen , Adler Murphy & McQuillen, LLP, Steven Lee Boldt , Adler Murphy & McQuillen, LLP & Todd Matthew Saranecki , Adler Murphy & McQuillen, LLP.

DRI Relays, Inc., Defendant, represented by Clayton Wickliffe Thornton , Thornton Davis & Fein, P.A..

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Coordinate [Docket No. 58]. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff's claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

Plaintiff asks the Court to issue an order coordinating discovery in this action with a related case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases