PLASTECH HOLDING CORPORATION v. WM GreenTECH AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION

Case No. 14-cv-14049.

PLASTECH HOLDING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WM GREENTECH AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

January 8, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Plastech Holding Corporation, a Michigan corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Fred A. Schwartz , Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Keechl, Jacob W. Buchdahl , Susman Godfrey LLp, Sarah Lindsay Rickard , Sommers Schwartz PC, Seth D. Ard , Susman Godfrey LLP, Shawn J. Rabin , Susman Godfrey L.L.P., Zachary B. Savage , Susman Godfrey LLP & Andrew Kochanowski , Sommers Schwartz, P.C..

WM GreenTech Automotive Corp., a Virginia corporation, Defendant, represented by Jeremy David Lockhart , Honigman Miller & Lawrence J. Murphy , Honigman, Miller,.

GreenTech Automotive Corp., a Virginia corporation, Defendant, represented by Jeremy David Lockhart , Honigman Miller & Lawrence J. Murphy , Honigman, Miller,.

GreenTech Automotive, Inc., a Mississippi corporation, Defendant, represented by Jeremy David Lockhart , Honigman Miller & Lawrence J. Murphy , Honigman, Miller,.

JAC Motors, Defendant, represented by David B. Viar .

JAC Motors, Intervenor, represented by Adam T. Schnatz , The Miller Law Firm, David B. Viar & Richard L. Merpi , Miller Law Firm, P.C..

JAC Motors, Counter Claimant, represented by David B. Viar .

Plastech Holding Corporation, a Michigan corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Fred A. Schwartz , Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Keechl, Jacob W. Buchdahl , Susman Godfrey LLp, Sarah Lindsay Rickard , Sommers Schwartz PC, Seth D. Ard , Susman Godfrey LLP, Shawn J. Rabin , Susman Godfrey L.L.P., Zachary B. Savage , Susman Godfrey LLP & Andrew Kochanowski , Sommers Schwartz, P.C..


OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT JAC MOTORS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT IV OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt. 43)

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendant JAC Motors' motion to dismiss count IV of the second amended complaint (Dkt. 43). Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases