1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. REAL ALTERNATIVES, INC. v. BURWELL
 

REAL ALTERNATIVES, INC. v. BURWELL

No. 1:15-cv-0105.

REAL ALTERNATIVES, INC.; KEVIN I. BAGATTA, ESQ.; THOMAS A. LANG, ESQ.; CLIFFORD W. McKEOWN, ESQ. Plaintiffs, v. SYLVIA M. BURWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

December 10, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Real Alternatives, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Elissa M Graves, Alliance Defending Freedom, Jeremy L. Samek, Independence Law Center & Matthew S. Bowman, Alliance Defending Freedom.

Kevin I Bagatta, Plaintiff, represented by Elissa M Graves, Alliance Defending Freedom, Jeremy L. Samek, Independence Law Center & Matthew S. Bowman, Alliance Defending Freedom.

Thomas A Lang, Plaintiff, represented by Elissa M Graves, Alliance Defending Freedom, Jeremy L. Samek, Independence Law Center & Matthew S. Bowman, Alliance Defending Freedom.

Clifford W McKeown, Plaintiff, represented by Elissa M Graves, Alliance Defending Freedom, Jeremy L. Samek, Independence Law Center & Matthew S. Bowman, Alliance Defending Freedom.

Sylvia Burwell, Defendant, represented by Adam A Grogg, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs.

Thomas E. Perez, Defendant, represented by Adam A Grogg, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs.

Jacob J Lew, Defendant, represented by Adam A Grogg, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs.

United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant, represented by Adam A Grogg, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs.

United States Department of Labor, Defendant, represented by Adam A Grogg, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs.

United States Department of the Treasury, Defendant, represented by Adam A Grogg, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs.

ORDER

In conformity with the Memorandum issued on today's date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 29) is DENIED. 2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment... Let's get started Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders. Updated daily. Uncompromising quality. Complete, Accurate, Current. SubscribeNow!

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases