U.S. v. GABRIEL LAKES

No. CR 115-077.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GABRIEL LAKES TREY McCLENDON.

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Augusta Division.

December 3, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melvin Howard, Defendant, represented by Keith Bernard Johnson , Keith B. Johnson, LLC.

George Carter, Defendant, represented by Henry Nelson Crane, III , Crane Law Firm, PC.

Jerome Flournoy, Defendant, represented by Adrian L. Patrick , Law Office of Adrian L. Patrick.

Gabriel Lakes, Defendant, represented by Melissa Detchemendy , Victor Hawk, PC & Victor Hawk , Victor Hawk, PC.

Deon Johnson, Defendant, represented by Peter D. Johnson , Peter D. Johnson, Attorney At Law.

Brandon Charles Wright, Defendant, represented by Page A. Pate , The Pate Law Firm, LLC & Bruce Steven Harvey , Law Office of Bruce S. Harvey.

Henry Lee Washington, Defendant, represented by David Mitchell Stewart , Crowder Stewart, LLP.

Trey McClendon, Defendant, represented by J. Travis Griffin , Hogue and Hogue, LLP & Sarah Floyd Blake , Floyd, Leopard & Black, LLP.

Charvis Lawrence, Defendant, represented by Dwight L. Thomas , D. Lowell Thomas, PC & Chauncey Napoleon Barnwell , Brown Barnwell, PC.

Timothy Andre Wells, Defendant, represented by James A Yancey, Jr. , James A. Yancey, PC & Wanda S. Jackson , Wanda S. Jackson, PC.

Johnny Bivens, Defendant, represented by James Pete Theodocion , J. Pete Theodocion, PC.

Douglas Matthew Powell, Defendant, represented by David P. Dekle , David P. Dekle, PC.

Eugene Michael Gross, Defendant, represented by Wendell E. Johnston, Jr. , Johnston & Smith, LLP.

Kenny Danford, Defendant, represented by Jason W. Blanchard , Tucker, Long, PC.

Michael Sassnett, Defendant, represented by Brendan N. Fleming , Brendan N. Fleming, LLC.

USA, Plaintiff, represented by Patricia Green Rhodes , U.S. Attorney's Office, Brian T. Rafferty , U.S. Attorney's Office, Edward J. Tarver , U.S. Attorney's Office, James D. Durham , U.S. Attorney's Office & Nancy Colleen Greenwood , U.S. Attorney's Office.


ORDER

Counsel in the above-captioned case have advised the Court that all pretrial motions have been satisfied or otherwise resolved. (See doc. no. 245.) Therefore, a motions hearing for the above-captioned Defendants is not necessary, and all of their pending motions are MOOT...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases