FATPIPE NETWORKS INDIA LIMITED v. XROADS NETWORKS, INC.

Case No. 2:09-cv-00186-DN.

FATPIPE NETWORKS INDIA LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. XROADS NETWORKS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division.

September 22, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fatpipe Networks India Limited, Plaintiff, represented by Brent O. Hatch, HATCH JAMES & DODGE, Manny J. Caixeiro, PERKINS COIE LLP, Timothy J. Carroll, PERKINS COIE LLP, Mitchell A. Stephens, HATCH JAMES & DODGE, Shaunda L. McNeill, HATCH JAMES & DODGE & Steven M. Lubezny, PERKINS COIE LLP.

Xroads Networks, Defendant, represented by Blake T. Ostler, THOMPSON OSTLER & OLSEN, Jeffrey R. Olsen & John C. O'Malley, NEWPORT TRIAL GROUP.

Xroads Networks, Counter Claimant, represented by Blake T. Ostler, THOMPSON OSTLER & OLSEN, Jeffrey R. Olsen & John C. O'Malley, NEWPORT TRIAL GROUP.

Fatpipe Networks India Limited, Counter Defendant, represented by Brent O. Hatch, HATCH JAMES & DODGE, Manny J. Caixeiro, PERKINS COIE LLP, Timothy J. Carroll, PERKINS COIE LLP, Mitchell A. Stephens, HATCH JAMES & DODGE & Steven M. Lubezny, PERKINS COIE LLP.


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

FatPipe's Motion for Sanctions for Ticket Database Spoliation ("447 Motion")1 argues XRoads should be sanctioned for "multiple violations" that occurred "during discovery of the [XRoads] customer tickets and their database...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases