1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. RICOH COMPANY, LTD. v. QUANTA COMPUTER, INC.
 

RICOH COMPANY, LTD. v. QUANTA COMPUTER, INC.

No. 06-cv-462-bbc.

RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Plaintiff, v. QUANTA COMPUTER, INC. and QUANTA STORAGE, INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

September 23, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Walker , Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, PLLC, John Christopher Rozendaal , Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, PLLC, Michael John Guzman , Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, PLLC, Michael E Joffre , Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, PLLC, Kenneth B. Axe , Boardman & Clark LLP & Mark C Hansen , Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, PLLC.

QUANTA COMPUTER INC., Defendant, represented by Erin Elizabeth Sears , Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker, JOHN E. PORTER , PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, MAXWELL A. FOX , PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, Peter James Wied , Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP & Todd G. Smith , Godfrey & Kahn, S.C..

QUANTA STORAGE INC., Defendant, represented by Erin Elizabeth Sears , Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker, JOHN E. PORTER , PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, MAXWELL A. FOX , PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, Peter James Wied , Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP & Todd G. Smith , Godfrey & Kahn, S.C..

QUANTA COMPUTER USA, INC., Defendant, represented by Erin Elizabeth Sears , Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker, JOHN E. PORTER , PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, MAXWELL A. FOX , PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, Peter James Wied , Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP & Todd G. Smith , Godfrey & Kahn, S.C..

PHILIPS TAIWAN, LTD., Defendant, represented by ALAN M. GRIMALDI , HOWREY LLP, MATTHEW E. HOCKER , HOWREY LLP & Steven Yovits , Howrey LLP.

BUSINESS LINE DATA, PHILIPS OPTICAL STORAGE, Defendant, represented by Edward J. Pardon , Merchant & Gould, P.C., MATTHEW E. HOCKER , HOWREY LLP, Steven Yovits , Howrey LLP & ALAN M. GRIMALDI , HOWREY LLP.

ORDER

In an order dated July 30, 2015, I directed the parties to show cause why all the filings in this case should not be unsealed. Dkt. #557. In response, plaintiff has submitted a list of documents that it believes should remain sealed. Dkt. #560. All of these are confidential license agreements or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases