FINJAN, INC. v. PROOFPOINT, INC.

Case No. 13-CV-05808-HSG.

FINJAN, INC., Plaintiff, v. PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

September 10, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

PAUL J. ANDRE , LISA KOBIALKA , JAMES HANNAH , KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP, Menlo Park, CA, Counsel for Plaintiff FINJAN, INC.

JENNIFER A KASH , SEAN PAK , IMAN LORDGOOEI , SAM STAKE , QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART , San Francisco, California, Counsel for Defendants, PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR CERTAIN DISCOVERY

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. and Defendants Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases