LAM v. THE CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Case No. 10-cv-4641-PJH.

ALFRED LAM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

July 22, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred Lam, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Alfred Lam, Plaintiff, represented by Bruce Carl Janke.

Paula Leiato, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Paula Leiato, Plaintiff, represented by Bruce Carl Janke.

The City & County of San Francisco, Defendant, represented by Rafal Ofierski, San Francisco City Attorney's Office & Jenica Diane Maldonado, Office of the City Attorney.

Timothy Diestel, Defendant, represented by Rafal Ofierski, San Francisco City Attorney's Office.

Dennis Doyle, Defendant, represented by Rafal Ofierski, San Francisco City Attorney's Office.

Alfred Fleck, Defendant, represented by Rafal Ofierski, San Francisco City Attorney's Office.

Charles Lewis, Defendant, represented by Rafal Ofierski, San Francisco City Attorney's Office.

Toni Ratcliff Powell, Defendant, represented by Rafal Ofierski, San Francisco City Attorney's Office.

John Radogno, Defendant, represented by Rafal Ofierski, San Francisco City Attorney's Office.

Tamara Ratcliff, Defendant, represented by Rafal Ofierski, San Francisco City Attorney's Office.

Mildred Singh, Defendant, represented by Mildred Singh.

Robert Taylor, Defendant, represented by Rafal Ofierski, San Francisco City Attorney's Office.

Barry Young, Defendant, represented by Rafal Ofierski, San Francisco City Attorney's Office.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Before the court is plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration of the order denying plaintiffs' motion to stay proceedings pending appeal. In the motion for reconsideration, plaintiffs address the four factors governing the issuance of a stay, which were set forth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases