1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 115 F.Supp.3d
  5. 115 F.Supp.3d 1024 (2015)
 

MOHAMED v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES

No. C-14-5200 EMC.

115 F.Supp.3d 1024 (2015)

Abdul Kadir MOHAMED, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, ET AL., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed July 22, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradley Keith King, Robert Ahdoot, Theodore Walter Maya, Tina Wolfson, West Hollywood, CA, for Plaintiff.

Andrew Michael Spurchise, Emily Erin O'connor, John C. Fish, Jr., Joshua Seth Lipshutz, Kevin Joseph Ring-Dowell, Rod M. Fliegel, San Francisco, CA, Debra W. Yang, Marcellus Antonio McRae, Theane D. Evangelis, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Los Angeles, CA, Dhananjay Saikrishna Manthripragada, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL

I. INTRODUCTION

On June 9, 2015, this Court denied a motion to compel arbitration filed by Defendants Uber Technologies and Rasier LLC (collectively, Uber). See Mohamed v. Uber Techs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases