1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ADIDAS AG v. UNDER ARMOUR, INC.
 

ADIDAS AG v. UNDER ARMOUR, INC.

Civil Action No. 14-130-GMS.

ADIDAS AG and ADIDAS AMERICA, INC., Plaintiffs, v. UNDER ARMOUR, INC. and MAPMYFITNESS, INC., Defendants,

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

June 15, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adidas AG, Plaintiff, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Caroline K. Wray , Charles A. Pannell, III , Matias Ferrario , Michael Morlock & Mitchell G. Stockwell .

Adidas America, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

Under Armour Inc., Defendant, represented by Richard L. Horwitz , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Anish G. Desai , Bindu Ann George Palapura , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Brian Ferguson , Christopher T. Marando , David Ellis Moore , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Robert T. Vlasis , Stephen Bosco , William Sutton Ansley & Zachary Garthe .

MapMyFitness Inc., Defendant, represented by Richard L. Horwitz , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Bindu Ann George Palapura , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP & David Ellis Moore , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP.

MapMyFitness Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by David Ellis Moore , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP.

Adidas AG, Counter Defendant, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

Adidas America, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

Under Armour Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Richard L. Horwitz , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Anish G. Desai , Brian Ferguson , David Ellis Moore , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Robert T. Vlasis , Stephen Bosco , William Sutton Ansley & Zachary Garthe .

Adidas AG, Counter Defendant, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

Adidas America, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

ORDER CONSTRUING THE TERMS OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,957,752; 8,244,226; 8,068,858; 7,905,815; 7,931,562; 8,652,009; 8,725,276; 8,579,767; 8,721,502

The court having considered the submissions of the parties and having heard oral argument on the matter—IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases