1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GRAND CANYON TRUST v. WILLIAMS
 

GRAND CANYON TRUST v. WILLIAMS

No. CV-13-08045-PCT-DGC.

Grand Canyon Trust, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael Williams, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

May 26, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grand Canyon Trust, Plaintiff, represented by Marc D Fink , Center for Biological Diversity, Neil Levine , Grand Canyon Trust, Richard Warren Hughes , Rothstein Donatelli Hughes Dahlstrom Schoenburg & Roger Flynn , Western Mining Action Project.

Center for Biological Diversity, Plaintiff, represented by Marc D Fink , Center for Biological Diversity, Neil Levine , Grand Canyon Trust, Richard Warren Hughes , Rothstein Donatelli Hughes Dahlstrom Schoenburg & Roger Flynn , Western Mining Action Project.

Sierra Club, Plaintiff, represented by Marc D Fink , Center for Biological Diversity, Neil Levine , Grand Canyon Trust, Richard Warren Hughes , Rothstein Donatelli Hughes Dahlstrom Schoenburg & Roger Flynn , Western Mining Action Project.

Havasupai Tribe, Plaintiff, represented by Marc D Fink , Center for Biological Diversity, Neil Levine , Grand Canyon Trust, Richard Warren Hughes , Rothstein Donatelli Hughes Dahlstrom Schoenburg & Roger Flynn , Western Mining Action Project.

Michael Williams, Forest Supervisor, Kaibab National Forest, Defendant, represented by Jared S Pettinato , US Dept of Justice.

United States Forest Service, an agency in the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Defendant, represented by Jared S Pettinato , US Dept of Justice.

Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Incorporated, Intervenor, represented by Bradley Joseph Glass , Gallagher & Kennedy PA, David J DePippo , Hunton & Williams & Michael K Kennedy , Gallagher & Kennedy PA.

EFR Arizona Strip LLC, Intervenor, represented by Bradley Joseph Glass , Gallagher & Kennedy PA, David J DePippo , Hunton & Williams & Michael K Kennedy , Gallagher & Kennedy PA.

ORDER

Plaintiffs have filed separate motions asking the Court to issue an injunction pending appeal. Docs. 169, 177. Plaintiffs also seek an expedited ruling. Id. No party has requested oral argument. The motions are fully briefed. For the reasons that follow, the Court will enter this expedited...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases