1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S. v. CHRISTOPHERSON
 

U.S. v. CHRISTOPHERSON

Case No. 2:09-cr-00056-MMD-VCF.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. IAN CHRISTOPHERSON, Defendant-Petitioner.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

February 5, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

USA, Plaintiff, represented by Camille W. Damm , U.S. Attorney, Elizabeth C Hadden , United States Department of Justice, Tax Division & Kathryn C. Newman , U.S. Attorneys Office.

ORDER

MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.

Before the Court are two motions: (1) Motion to Clarify Status As Pro Se and Indigent ("Motion to Clarify") (dkt. no. 191); and (2) Motion to Produce Billing Records ("Motion to Produce") (dkt. no. 192).

In the Motion to Clarify, Petitioner appears to seek guidance that he may represent himself in his anticipated writ of habeas corpus proceedings and that he qualifies for in forma pauperis status...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases