1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MONROE v. CITY OF RICHMOND
 

MONROE v. CITY OF RICHMOND

Case No. CV 14-00795WHO.

EDWARD MONROE Plaintiff, v. CITY OF RICHMOND and DOES 1-10 INCLUSIVE Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

January 13, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

JOHN T. BELL , Law Offices of John T. Bell, Oakland, CA, Attorney for Plaintiff Edward Monroe.

MANNING & KASS, ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP, Patrick L. Hurley , Attorneys for Defendant, CITY OF RICHMOND.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUT-OFF

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, John T. Bell for Plaintiff Edward Monroe and Patrick Hurley for Defendant City of Richmond herewith stipulate to extend the discovery cut-off date to March 20, 2015.

ATTESTMENT OF CONCURENCE PER GENERAL ORDER 45 FOR FILING

I attest that concurrence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases