1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SIEBERT v. GENE SECURITY NETWORK, INC.
 

SIEBERT v. GENE SECURITY NETWORK, INC.

Case No. 11-cv-01987-JST.

GARY SIEBERT, Plaintiff, v. GENE SECURITY NETWORK, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

January 26, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Siebert, Plaintiff, represented by Stephen R. Jaffe , The Jaffe Law Firm & Bailey Bifoss , The Jaffe Law Firm.

Gene Security Network, Inc, Defendant, represented by Evan Nadel , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC, Benjamin Ross Sigel , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC, Brandon F. White , Foley Hoag LLP, Daniel N. Marx , Foley Hoag LLP, Jessica Christine Lowne Sergi , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC, Kevin M. McGinty , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC & Michael Licker , Foley Hoag LLP.

United States of America, Miscellaneous, represented by Melanie Lea Proctor , United States Attorney's Office.

Gene Security Network, Inc, Counter-claimant, represented by Evan Nadel , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC, Benjamin Ross Sigel , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC, Daniel N. Marx , Foley Hoag LLP, Jessica Christine Lowne Sergi , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC, Kevin M. McGinty , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC & Michael Licker , Foley Hoag LLP.

Gary Siebert, Counter-defendant, represented by Stephen R. Jaffe , The Jaffe Law Firm & Bailey Bifoss , The Jaffe Law Firm.

Gene Security Network, Inc, Counter-claimant, represented by Evan Nadel , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC, Benjamin Ross Sigel , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC, Daniel N. Marx , Foley Hoag LLP, Jessica Christine Lowne Sergi , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC, Kevin M. McGinty , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC & Michael Licker , Foley Hoag LLP.

Gary Siebert, Counter-defendant, represented by Stephen R. Jaffe , The Jaffe Law Firm & Bailey Bifoss , The Jaffe Law Firm.

ORDER RE DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF MICHELLE BULLS AND MICHELLE BULLS' DECLARATION

Re: Dkt. Nos. 147, 181

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

Now before the Court are the parties' respective designations of the deposition testimony of Michelle Bulls. Portions of Bulls' deposition testimony is admissible because she resides more than 100 miles from the courthouse. Fed. R. Civ. P. 32(a)(4)(B).

Plaintiff Gary Siebert originally designated a substantial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases