1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH v. FLUOR CORPORATION
 

CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH v. FLUOR CORPORATION

Case No. 10-cv-05105-WHO.

CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, Plaintiff, v. FLUOR CORPORATION, Defendant. THE SHILOH GROUP, Intervenor/Plaintiff, v. FLUOR CORPORATION, Defendant. FLUOR CORPORATION, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. SHILOH ROAD, WEST COAST METALS, INC., M&M SERVICES, INC. Third-Party Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

January 22, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

California River Watch, Plaintiff, represented by Jack Silver , Law Office of Jack Silver & Joseph Jerry Bernhaut , Law Office of Jack Silver.

Fluor Corporation, Defendant, represented by Thomas Michael Donnelly , Jones Day, Daniel Lawrence Corbett , Jones Day & Karen Ann Mignone , Verrill Dana, LLP.

The Shiloh Group, Intervenor, represented by Brian Charles Carter , Carter, Momsen Knight & Brian Scott Momsen , Carter Momsen & Knight LLP.

Fluor Corporation, 3rd party plaintiff, represented by Thomas Michael Donnelly , Jones Day, Daniel Lawrence Corbett , Jones Day & Karen Ann Mignone , Verrill Dana, LLP.

Shiloh Road, LLC, 3rd party defendant, represented by Robert C. Goodman , Rogers Joseph O'Donnell & David Kevin Shipp , Rogers Joseph O'Donnell.

West Coast Metals, Inc., 3rd party defendant, represented by Cameron S. Kirk, Jr. , C. Scott Kirk Law Office.

M&M Services, Inc., 3rd party defendant, represented by Thomas F. Vandenburg , Dongell Lawrence Finney LLP, Ani Adjemian , Dongell Lawrence Finney & Richard Alan Dongell , Dongell Lawrence Finney LLP.

Fluor Corporation, Counter-claimant, represented by Thomas Michael Donnelly , Jones Day, Daniel Lawrence Corbett , Jones Day & Karen Ann Mignone , Verrill Dana, LLP.

The Shiloh Group, Counter-defendant, represented by Brian Charles Carter , Carter, Momsen Knight & Brian Scott Momsen , Carter Momsen & Knight LLP.

ORDER REGARDING CONSENT JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 194

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff California River Watch and defendant Fluor Corporation have filed a stipulated request for approval and entry of a consent judgment. Dkt. No. 194. This litigation involves three separate complaints relating to 53 acres of real property located in Windsor, California (the "Site"): (i) River Watch filed a citizen suit against Fluor under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases