1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CLAUDIO v. BARFIELD
 

CLAUDIO v. BARFIELD

Case No. 5:13-cv-00354-MP-GRJ.

RAYMOND CLAUDIO, Plaintiff, v. BARFIELD, BROWN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division.

January 12, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

RAYMOND CLAUDIO, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

RANDALL BRYANT, Defendant, represented by DAVID WILLIAM GRIMES , FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERALL.

RANDALL BRYANT, WARDEN, Defendant, represented by MARCUS OWEN GRAPER , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

LINDA CAIN, Defendant, represented by DAVID WILLIAM GRIMES , FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL & MARCUS OWEN GRAPER , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

MARCELLUS GARNER, Defendant, represented by DAVID WILLIAM GRIMES , FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL & MARCUS OWEN GRAPER , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

RICKY CLOUD, Defendant, represented by DAVID WILLIAM GRIMES , FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL & MARCUS OWEN GRAPER , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

BARFIELD, Defendant, represented by DAVID WILLIAM GRIMES , FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL & MARCUS OWEN GRAPER , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

EDDIE JONES, Defendant, represented by DAVID WILLIAM GRIMES , FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL & MARCUS OWEN GRAPER , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

JOSH DUDLEY, Defendant, represented by DAVID WILLIAM GRIMES , FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL & MARCUS OWEN GRAPER , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

STREETMAN, Defendant, represented by DAVID WILLIAM GRIMES , FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL & MARCUS OWEN GRAPER , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

MICHAEL CREWS, Defendant, represented by DAVID WILLIAM GRIMES , FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL & MARCUS OWEN GRAPER , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

BROWN, Defendant, represented by DAVID WILLIAM GRIMES , FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL & MARCUS OWEN GRAPER , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

SHEDRICK MCGRIFF, Defendant, represented by DAVID WILLIAM GRIMES , FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL & MARCUS OWEN GRAPER , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

ORDER

MAURICE M. PAUL, Senior District Judge.

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 20, 2014. (Doc. 102). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). After being granted an extension of time, Doc. 104, plaintiff has filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases