1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ARTRIP v. BALL CORPORATION
 

ARTRIP v. BALL CORPORATION

Case No. 1:14CV00014.

JERRY ARTRIP, Plaintiff, v. BALL CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division.

December 22, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen Christopher Swift, Swift & Swift, Attorneys at Law, P.L.L.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Plaintiff.

John D. Luken , Jeffrey P. Hinebaugh , and Emily S. Meyer , Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, and Howard C. McElroy , McElroy, Hodges & Caldwell, Abingdon, Virginia, for Defendant Ball Corporation.

Mark M. Supko and Michael H. Jacobs , Crowell & Moring LLP, Washington, D.C., for Defendant Alcoa Inc.

OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES P. JONES, District Judge.

In this patent infringement case, I find that it is likely that the doctrine of laches bars the plaintiff's claims.Before making that determination, however, I will allow the parties an opportunity to respond.

The plaintiff, Jerry Artrip, contends in his Amended Complaint in this case that the defendants, Ball Corporation and Alcoa, Inc. ("Alcoa"), have infringed (or, in the case of Alcoa, contributorily...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases