1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 76 F.Supp.3d
  5. 76 F.Supp.3d 886 (2014)
 

OPENTV, INC. v. NETFLIX INC.

Case No. 14-cv-01525-RS.

76 F.Supp.3d 886 (2014)

OPENTV, INC., Plaintiff, v. NETFLIX INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed December 16, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick L. Cottrell, III, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE, George William Foster, Greg Polins, Matthew V. Topic, Kirkland and Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.

Jack B. Blumenfeld, Morris, Nichols, Arsht and Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE, Clement S. Roberts, Daralyn J. Durie, Eugene Novikov, Laura Elizabeth Miller, Zac Alexander Cox, Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco, CA, Brian Woo Lee, Mark D. Fahey, Kirkland and Ellis LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Laura E. Miller, Pro Hac Vice, for Defendants.

John Richard Edwards, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Palo Alto, CA, James Brian Medek, Paul David Collier, Russell Evan Levine, Kirkland and Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY UNDER § 101

I. INTRODUCTION

In this patent infringement action, defendant Netflix, Inc. seeks summary judgment that three of the patents-in-suit are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for failure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases