1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SILVESTER v. HARRIS
 

SILVESTER v. HARRIS

Case No. 1:11-CV-2137 AWI SAB.

JEFF SILVESTER, et al., Plaintiffs v. KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of California, and DOES 1 to 20, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

December 17, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeff Silvester, Plaintiff, represented by Bradley A. Benbrook , Benbrook Law Group, Stephen M. Duvernay , Benbrook Law Group, Victor John Otten , Otten Law, PC & Donald E. J. Kilmer, Jr. , Law Offices of Donald Kilmer, APC.

Michael Poeschl, Plaintiff, represented by Jason Andrew Davis , Davis and Associates, Victor John Otten , Otten Law, PC & Donald E. J. Kilmer, Jr. , Law Offices of Donald Kilmer, APC.

Brandon Combs, Plaintiff, represented by Bradley A. Benbrook , Benbrook Law Group, Stephen M. Duvernay , Benbrook Law Group, Victor John Otten , Otten Law, PC & Donald E. J. Kilmer, Jr. , Law Offices of Donald Kilmer, APC.

Calguns Foundation, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Bradley A. Benbrook , Benbrook Law Group, Stephen M. Duvernay , Benbrook Law Group, Victor John Otten , Otten Law, PC & Donald E. J. Kilmer, Jr. , Law Offices of Donald Kilmer, APC.

The Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Bradley A. Benbrook , Benbrook Law Group, Stephen M. Duvernay , Benbrook Law Group, Victor John Otten , Otten Law, PC & Donald E. J. Kilmer, Jr. , Law Offices of Donald Kilmer, APC.

Kamala D. Harris, Defendant, represented by Jonathan Michael Eisenberg , Office of the Attorney General, Kim L Nguyen , Office Of The Attorney General & Peter H. Chang , Office of the Attorney General.

Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, Amicus, represented by Neil R. O'Hanlon , Hogan Lovells Us LLP.

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES

(Doc. No. 108)

ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.

This case involved a Second Amendment challenge to statutes that imposed a 10-day waiting period between the time of purchase and time of possession of a firearm, and a Fourteenth Amendment challenge to 18 individual exemptions to the 10-day waiting period. Following a bench trial, the Court held that the 10-day waiting period violated the Second...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases