1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. EHRET v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 

EHRET v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case No. 3:14-cv-00113-EMC.

CAREN EHRET, Plaintiff, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

December 10, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, John B. Quinn, Los Angeles, CA, Stephen A. Swedlow (pro hac vice), Amit B. Patel (pro hac vice), Chicago, IL, Arthur M. Roberts, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.

Hall Adams, Law Offices of Hall Adams LLC,1 Attorneys for Plaintiff.

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Pursuant to the Court's Order of November 26, 2014, Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") and Plaintiff Caren Ehret ("Plaintiff"), by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate as follows:

1. The deadline for Uber's production of emails and other ESI from additional custodians Travis Kalanick, Ryan Graves and Andrew Macdonald shall be January...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases