IN RE CATHODE RAY TUBE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case No. 07-5944 SC, MDL No. 1917.

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Document Relates to Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al., No. 11-cv-01656; Siegel v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv-05502; Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv-05513; Target Corp., et al. v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv-05514; Interbond Corporation of America v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv-06275; Office depot, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv-06276; CompuCom Systems, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv-06396; Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv-06397; P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 12-cv-02648; Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 12-cv-02649; Tech Data Corporation, et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 13-cv-00157; Sharp Electronics Corp., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 13-cv-01173; Sharp Electronics Corp., et al. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V., et al., No. 13-cv-02776; Siegel v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05261; Sears, Roebuck and Co., et al. v. Technicolor SA, No. 13-cv-05262; Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05264; Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05668; Target Corp., v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05686; Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-005723; Electrograph Systems, Inc., et al. v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05724; P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, et al. v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05725; Office Depot, Inc. v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05726; Interbond Corporation of America v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05727; ViewSonic Corporation, v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., et al., No. 3:14cv-02510; The Indirect Purchaser Action.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

October 22, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher M. Curran, (pro hac vice), Lucius B. Lau, (pro hac vice), Dana E. Foster, (pro hac vice), White & Case LLP, Washington, DC, Counsel to Defendants Toshiba, Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Consumer Products, L.L.C.; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.

Philip J. Iovieno, Anne M. Nardacci, William A. Isaacson, Stuart H. Singer, BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP, Albany, NY, Washington, D.C. Liaison Counsel for Direct Action Plaintiffs.

Lauren C. Russell, TRUMP ALIOTO TRUMP & PRESCOTT ATTORNEYS LLP, San Francisco, CA, Lead Counsel for the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs.


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL TOSHIBA TO RESPOND TO DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFFS AND INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS' FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

This Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending the Deadline to File Motion to Compel Toshiba to Respond to Direct Action Plaintiffs and Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs' First Set of Requests...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases