1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 74 F.Supp.3d
  5. 74 F.Supp.3d 902 (2014)
 

SOO LINE R. CO. v. BROTH. OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS

Case No. 14 C 4489.

74 F.Supp.3d 902 (2014)

SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant, v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS and Trainmen and United Transportation Union, Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

Signed November 21, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles W. Webster, Soo Line Railroad d/b/a Canadian Pacific, Franklin Park, IL, James Stanton Whitehead, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.

Margo Pave, Zwerdling, Paul, Leibig, Kahn and Wolly, Washington, DC, Ryan A. Hagerty, Asher, Gittler & D'Alba, Robert Earl Harrington, III, Harrington, Thompson, Acker & Harrington, Ltd., Chicago, IL, Erika A. Diehl-Gibbons, Kevin C. Brodar, North Olmsted, OH, for Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

This case arises from a labor dispute between Soo Line Railroad Company ("Soo") and two unions, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen ("BLET") and the United Transportation Union ("UTU"), about the creation of a cross-border freight pool between Thief River Falls, Minnesota...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases