1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. COX v. MITTAL
 

COX v. MITTAL

Cause No. 2:13-CV-81 RLM.

WILLIAM COX, Plaintiff v. ARCELLOR MITTAL, GERALD COOK, JOSEPH MEDELLIN, and MARY LYNN GARGAS-SOUTH, Defendants

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division.

November 19, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Cox, Plaintiff, represented by Robin G Remley , Law Offices of Robin Remley LLC.

Arcellor Mittal, Defendant, represented by Christopher J DeGroff , Seyfarth Shaw LLP & Kyle R Hartman , Seyfarth Shaw LLP.

Gerald Cook, Defendant, represented by Christopher J DeGroff , Seyfarth Shaw LLP & Kyle R Hartman , Seyfarth Shaw LLP.

Joseph Medellin, Defendant, represented by Christopher J DeGroff , Seyfarth Shaw LLP & Kyle R Hartman , Seyfarth Shaw LLP.

Mary Lynn Gargas-South, Defendant, represented by Christopher J DeGroff , Seyfarth Shaw LLP & Kyle R Hartman , Seyfarth Shaw LLP.

OPINION and ORDER

ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.

With this case more than twenty months old, plaintiff William Cox has yet to appear for his deposition. The deposition was first scheduled — finally scheduled, according to the exasperation evident in defense counsel's letter confirming agreement on the date — on May 22 of this year, nine days short of the discovery deadline. Mr. Cox's deposition was to kick off discovery because the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases