LUIS RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff,
v.
SEAN BUBNIS, City of Utica Police Officer; SAMUEL GEDDES, City of Utica Police Officer; RICHARD ROE, Unknown City of Utica Police Officer; JOHN DOE, Unknown City of Utica Police Officer; and CITY OF UTICA, NEW YORK, Defendants.
United States District Court, N.D. New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 13, 2014.
November 13, 2014.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Luis Rodriguez, Plaintiff, represented by Lawrence Golden, Golden Law Firm & B. Brooks Benson, Office of Peter M. Hobaica, LLC.
Sean Bubnis, a police officer of the City of Utica, New York, Defendant, represented by John P. Orilio, Office of Corporation Counsel, Joan K. Harris, City of Utica - Corporation Counsel & Mark C. Curley, City of Utica - Corporation Counsel.
Samuel Geddes, a police officer of the City of Utica, New York, Defendant, represented by John P. Orilio, Office of Corporation Counsel, Joan K. Harris, City of Utica - Corporation Counsel & Mark C. Curley, City of Utica - Corporation Counsel.
Richard Roe, a fictitious name intended to represent the name of one or more City of Utica police officers, whose actual identities are as yet unknown, Defendant, represented by John P. Orilio, Office of Corporation Counsel, Joan K. Harris, City of Utica - Corporation Counsel & Mark C. Curley, City of Utica - Corporation Counsel.
John Doe, a fictitious name intended to represent the names of one or more City of Utica police officers, whose actual identities are as yet unknown, Defendant, represented by John P. Orilio, Office of Corporation Counsel, Joan K. Harris, City of Utica - Corporation Counsel & Mark C. Curley, City of Utica - Corporation Counsel.
The City of Utica, New York, Defendant, represented by John P. Orilio, Office of Corporation Counsel, Joan K. Harris, City of Utica - Corporation Counsel & Mark C. Curley, City of Utica - Corporation Counsel.
United States District Court, N.D. New York.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
[ ] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
[X] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 22) is...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
