TAMAS v. FAMILY VIDEO MOVIE CLUB, INC.

No. 11 C 1024.

ALINA TAMAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FAMILY VIDEO MOVIE CLUB, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

October 29, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alina Tamas, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Dunlap , Fibich Hampton Leebron Briggs Josephson, Douglas M. Werman , Werman Salas P.C., Joseph Carter Melugin , Fibich, Hampton, Leebron, Briggs & Josephson, LLP, Lindsay R. Itkin , Fibich, Leebron, Copeland, Briggs & Josephson, L.l.p., Maureen Ann Salas , Werman Salas P.C., Michael A. Josephson , Fibich, Hampton, LeeBron, Briggs & Josephson, Sarah Jean Arendt , Werman Salas P.C. & Zachary Cole Flowerree , Werman Salas P.C..

Family Video Movie Club, Inc., Defendant, represented by Joel Christopher Griswold , Baker & Hostetler, LLP, John Conlaeth McIlwee , Baker & Hostetler LLP & Melissa Anne Siebert , Baker & Hostetler LLP.


ORDER

MARY M. ROWLAND, Magistrate Judge.

Defendant Family Video Movie Club, Inc.'s Motion to Compel [254] is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs will produce documents within 30 days from the date of this Order. The supplemental interrogatory responses are due 90 days from the date of this Order.

STATEMENT

Background

Plaintiff, Alina Tamas, brings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases