CHARLES T. DAVIS, Plaintiff,
v.
C/O KISSINGER; et al, Defendants.
United States District Court, E.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 28, 2014.
October 28, 2014.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Charles T. Davis, Plaintiff, represented by Donald Aquinas Lancaster, Jr., The Lancaster Law Group, A Professional Corporation.
- Kissinger, Defendant, represented by Monica Noella Anderson, Attorney General's Office of the State of California & R. Lawrence Bragg, Office of the Attorney General.
Baker, Defendant, represented by Monica Noella Anderson, Attorney General's Office of the State of California & R. Lawrence Bragg, Office of the Attorney General.
- Qualls, Defendant, represented by Monica Noella Anderson, Attorney General's Office of the State of California & R. Lawrence Bragg, Office of the Attorney General.
- Money, Defendant, represented by Monica Noella Anderson, Attorney General's Office of the State of California & R. Lawrence Bragg, Office of the Attorney General.
- Ingwerson, Defendant, represented by Monica Noella Anderson, Attorney General's Office of the State of California & R. Lawrence Bragg, Office of the Attorney General.
Garrison, Defendant, represented by Monica Noella Anderson, Attorney General's Office of the State of California & R. Lawrence Bragg, Office of the Attorney General.
- Norlin, Defendant, represented by Monica Noella Anderson, Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
D. L. Runnels, Defendant, represented by Monica Noella Anderson, Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
Peery, Defendant, represented by Monica Noella Anderson, Attorney General's Office of the State of California & R. Lawrence Bragg, Office of the Attorney General.
United States District Court, E.D. California.
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants' Motion in Limine to Dismiss Plaintiff's Untimely State Law Claims. (ECF No. 301.) Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff's claims under the Ralph Act, California Civil Code Section 51.7, and the Bane Act, California Civil Code 52.1, as well as under California Civil Code Sections 43 and 52.3.1 (ECF No. 301 at 1.) These claims comprise...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
