1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S. v. BROWNING
 

U.S. v. BROWNING

No. 12-03105-01-CR-S-MDH.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW PAUL BROWNING, and KENT TICH TRAN, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Southern Division.

September 15, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew Paul Browning, Defendant, represented by Dan Viets, Dan Viets Law Office & Donald R. Cooley.

Kent Tich Tran, Defendant, represented by Andrew J. Sottile, Andrew Sottile Attorney at Law, LLC, Shane Paul Cantin, Thomas D. Carver & James W. Schottel, Jr., Schottel & Associates, P.C..

USA, Plaintiff, represented by Ami Harshad Patel Miller, United States Attorney's Office.

ORDER

MATT J. WHITWORTH, Magistrate Judge.

Defendant Matthew Paul Browning has filed a motion to dismiss Counts One, Two, Four, Six, Seven, Ten and Eleven of the Superseding Indictment. (Doc. 68). Defendant alleges these Counts should be dismissed because the statutes the government relies on its Superseding Indictment, Title 21, U.S.C., §§ 802(32)(A) and 813, are unconstitutionally vague under the Due Process clause of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases