SHAW v. INTERTHINX, INC.

Civil Action No. 13-cv-01229-REB-BNB.

CELESTE SHAW, and JUDITH VERHEECKE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. INTERTHINX, INC., a California corporation, VERISK ANALYTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and JEFFREY MOYER, an individual, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

October 7, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Celeste Shaw, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Dickson Kuhn, Lewis Kuhn Swan PC, Andrew Edward Swan, Lewis Kuhn Swan PC, Jessica Lee Riggin, Rukin Hyland Doria & Tindall LLP, Paul Forrest Lewis, Lewis Kuhn Swan PC, Steven M. Tindall, Rukin Hyland Doria & Tindall LLP & Rowdy Byron Meeks, Rowdy Meeks Legal Group, LLC.

Judith Verheecke, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Dickson Kuhn, Lewis Kuhn Swan PC, Jessica Lee Riggin, Rukin Hyland Doria & Tindall LLP, Paul Forrest Lewis, Lewis Kuhn Swan PC & Steven M. Tindall, Rukin Hyland Doria & Tindall LLP.

Shabnam Sheila Dehdashtian, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Dickson Kuhn, Lewis Kuhn Swan PC.

Dejan Nagl, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Dickson Kuhn, Lewis Kuhn Swan PC.

Medhat Gareeb, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Dickson Kuhn, Lewis Kuhn Swan PC.

Verisk Analytics Inc, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant, represented by Nicholas Anthony Murray, Jackson Lewis, P.C., Angela Quiles Nevarez, Jackson Lewis, P.C., Leila Nourani, Jackson Lewis, LLP, Nicky Jatana, Jackson Lewis, LLP & Peter Francis Munger, Jackson Lewis, P.C..

Interthinx Inc, a California Corporation, Defendant, represented by Nicholas Anthony Murray, Jackson Lewis, P.C., Angela Quiles Nevarez, Jackson Lewis, P.C., Leila Nourani, Jackson Lewis, LLP, Nicky Jatana, Jackson Lewis, LLP & Peter Francis Munger, Jackson Lewis, P.C..


ORDER

BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge.

This matter arises on the parties' Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Amendment of Pleadings Deadline and to Amend the First Amended Complaint [Doc. # 218, filed 10/1/2014] (the "Motion to Amend"). Good cause having been shown,

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Motion to Amend [Doc. # 218] is GRANTED; and

(2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing the Second...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases