CHRISTOPHER HARBRIDGE, Plaintiff,
v.
YATES, et al, Defendants.
United States District Court, E.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 3, 2014.
October 3, 2014.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Christopher Harbridge, Plaintiff, Pro Se.
R. H. Trimble, Defendant, represented by Diana Esquivel , Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
J. L. Brown, Defendant, represented by Diana Esquivel , Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
D. Reeves, Defendant, represented by Diana Esquivel , Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
Officer Munoz, Defendant, represented by Diana Esquivel , Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
Officer Singleton, Defendant, represented by Diana Esquivel , Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
Sergeant Collier, Defendant, represented by Diana Esquivel , Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
Franco, Defendant, represented by Diana Esquivel , Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
Hall, Defendant, represented by Diana Esquivel , Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
Herrera, Defendant, represented by Diana Esquivel , Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
Lee, Defendant, represented by Diana Esquivel , Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
McBride, Defendant, represented by Diana Esquivel , Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
Officer Redding, Defendant, represented by Diana Esquivel , Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
Correctional Officer Tucker, Defendant, represented by Diana Esquivel , Attorney General's Office of the State of California.
United States District Court, E.D. California.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL
ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Christopher Harbridge, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 4, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to compel responses to his discovery, or in the alternative, for enlargement of time to conduct discovery which was denied...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
