1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
 

GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Case No. 5:13 cv 2465.

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

September 29, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Plaintiff, represented by Bruce A. Khula, Squire Patton Boggs & Jill G. Okun, Squire Patton Boggs.

Lockheed Martin Corporation, Defendant, represented by Michael F. Mason, Hogan Lovells US, Thomas L. McGovern, III, Hogan & Hartson & Gregory J. DeGulis, McMahon DeGulis.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SARA LIOI, District Judge.

In this action for indemnification, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Goodyear) claims it is entitled to recover from defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation (Lockheed) litigation expenses and attorney fees that Goodyear incurred in a case previously brought by Lockheed against Goodyear in the Northern District of Ohio that is now fully resolved.1 Soon after the instant case was filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases