PAN AM SYSTEMS INC. v. HARDENBERGH

Civil No. 2:11-cv-00339-NT.

PAN AM SYSTEMS INC., SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, and DAVID ANDREW FINK, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES HARDENBERGH and ATLANTIC NORTHEAST RAILS AND PORTS, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Maine.

September 30, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

PAN AM SYSTEMS INC, Plaintiff, represented by JONATHAN ANDREW POTTLE , EATON PEABODY & THAD B. ZMISTOWSKI , EATON PEABODY.

SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff, represented by JONATHAN ANDREW POTTLE , EATON PEABODY & THAD B. ZMISTOWSKI , EATON PEABODY.

DAVID ANDREW FINK, Plaintiff, represented by JONATHAN ANDREW POTTLE , EATON PEABODY & THAD B. ZMISTOWSKI , EATON PEABODY.

CHALMERS HARDENBERGH, Defendant, represented by RUSSELL PIERCE , NORMAN, HANSON & DETROY.

ATLANTIC NORTHEAST RAILS AND PORTS, Defendant, represented by RUSSELL PIERCE , NORMAN, HANSON & DETROY.


ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NANCY TORRESEN, District Judge.

The Plaintiffs, Pan Am Systems, Inc., Springfield Terminal Railway Company, and David Andrew Fink, bring claims for defamation and false light against Defendants Atlantic Northeast Rails & Ports and Charles Hardenbergh. The Plaintiffs also seek punitive damages. Before the Court is the Defendants' motion (ECF No. 65) seeking summary judgment on all the Plaintiffs' claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases