1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HARRISON v. ADAMS
 

HARRISON v. ADAMS

Case No. 1:08-cv-1065-AWI-MJS (PC).

MICHAEL D. HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. D. ADAMS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

September 29, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. Harrison, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

E. Urbano, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

Parsons, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

Campos, Defendant, represented by Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

E. V. Roth, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

R.N. M. Gonzalez, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

C. Gonzalez, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

T. Cisneros, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

M. Galvan, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

R. Casio, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

G. Vicente, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

B. Johnson, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

M. O'Neal, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

J.G. Coronado, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

Tumayo, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Real Party in Interest, Defendant, represented by Martin Kosla , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

(ECF No. 200)

MICHAEL J. SENG, Magistrate Judge.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff's Eighth Amended Complaint and found that it stated a cognizable claim against Defendants Jones, Moore, Burns, Dava, Kim, Edmonds, Galvan, C. Gonzalez, M. Gonzalez, Johnson,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases