UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. DALE TODD, Plaintiffs,
v.
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC., et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Colorado.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 16, 2014.
September 16, 2014.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Dale Todd, Plaintiff, represented by Joel M. Androphy, Berg & Androphy, David Howard Berg, Berg & Androphy, Harold Alan Haddon, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C., Norman R. Mueller, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C., Rachel Leeanne Grier, Berg & Androphy, Sarah Mary Frazier, Berg & Androphy & Ty Cheung Gee, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C..
Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eric Fisher, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P., John Michael McHugh, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P., Larry S. Pozner, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P., Sean Connelly, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P. & Kent Charles Modesitt, Jones & Keller, PC.
Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Eric Fisher, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P., Larry S. Pozner, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P., John Michael McHugh, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P. & Kent Charles Modesitt, Jones & Keller, PC.
Servicelink, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eric Fisher, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P., John Michael McHugh, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P., Larry S. Pozner, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P., Sean Connelly, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P. & Kent Charles Modesitt, Jones & Keller, PC.
Chicago Title Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Eric Fisher, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P., John Michael McHugh, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P., Larry S. Pozner, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P., Sean Connelly, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P. & Kent Charles Modesitt, Jones & Keller, PC.
ServiceLink, LLC, Defendant, represented by Eric Fisher, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P., John Michael McHugh, Reilly Pozner, L.L.P. & Kent Charles Modesitt, Jones & Keller, PC.
USA, Interested Party, represented by Jamie L. Mendelson, U.S. Attorney's Office.
United States District Court, D. Colorado.
ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.
This matter is before me on the following: (1) the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 9(b) [#121]1 filed on October 11, 2013; and (2) the corresponding Recommendation Regarding Defendants' Motion To Dismiss [#141] filed August 19...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.