1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S. v. KELLAM
 

U.S. v. KELLAM

No. CR 314-002.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JEROME KELLAM.

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division.

September 16, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Derrick Goins, also known as Cuz, Defendant (1), represented by J. Stanley Smith, Jr. , Smith & Garner, LLC & James C. Garner , Smith & Garner, LLC.

Verdell Goins, Jr., Defendant (2), represented by J. Stanley Smith, Jr. , Smith & Garner, LLC & James C. Garner , Smith & Garner, LLC.

Andre Colita Wright, also known as Dre also known as Andre Mason, Defendant (3), represented by C. Mitchell Warnock, Jr. , Mitchell Warnock, LLC.

Christopher Derrick Duty, also known as Derrick Duty, Defendant (4), represented by C. Mitchell Warnock, Jr. , Mitchell Warnock, LLC.

Brady Jerome Linton, also known as Brady Junior, Defendant (5), represented by Thomas Charles Rawlings , McMillan & Rawlings, LLP.

Anatay Sxlesyll Kyler, also known as Tay, Defendant (6), represented by Joseph I. Marchant , Joseph I. Marchant, LLC.

Jerome Kellam, Defendant (7), represented by C. Brian Jarrard , C. Brian Jarrard, LLC.

Christopher Paul Willis, also known as Florida, Defendant (8), represented by Tina Euginia Maddox , Hamilton & Maddox, LLC.

Luther Hurst, also known as Dank, Defendant (9), represented by Thomas Alexander Peterson, IV , The Law Firm of Tom A. Peterson, IV, LLC.

Derrick Bernard Moye, Defendant (10), represented by John Philip Fox , Fox & Smith, LLC.

USA, Plaintiff, represented by Karl Irving Knoche , U.S. Attorney's Office, Brian T. Rafferty , U.S. Attorney's Office, Edward J. Tarver , U.S. Attorney's Office & James D. Durham , U.S. Attorney's Office.

ORDER

BRIAN K. EPPS, Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court are the various pre-trial discovery motions filed by the parties. Many (if not all) discovery issues should be addressed in full by the Court's rulings below and the liberal discovery policy that the government has confirmed it is applying in this case. To the extent, if any, either party believes there are specific inadequacies in the discovery exchanged to date that are not addressed below, the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases